appycodes.

Laravel Development Services for Custom Business Platforms

We provide Laravel development services for custom business platforms, ERPs, CRMs, portals, APIs and Laravel modernisation projects. Laravel is a strong fit when a build needs structured business logic, transactional workflows, user roles, integrations, queues and long-term maintainability. We build new Laravel applications and modernise existing Laravel codebases so they remain secure, scalable and easier to maintain.

Laravel where the build is transactional

  • Greenfield ERPs, CRMs and B2B portals
  • Modernisation of old Laravel codebases
  • Vue, Inertia, Livewire or headless frontends
  • Tendering, contracts and billing reconciliation
  • Forge plus Cloudflare deployment patterns

Portfolio

Laravel Development Case Studies Across Business Platforms

Ontick logo

Event ticketing + staff ops

Read
230K+
tickets booked
£90K+
platform sales

Stack

Laravel · Vue.js · MySQL

Customer-facing ticketing plus a staff check-in app (Vite + React 18) sharing the design system. Two surfaces, one Laravel API.

Professional Energy Services (PES) logo

Custom ERP · energy brokerage

Read
$1M+
tenders flowing through
800+
broker hours saved

Stack

Laravel · Vue.js · MySQL

Tenders, CRM, accounting: three modules that off-the-shelf ERPs don't model. Tender ingestion across the UK energy market is the domain core.

All White Laser

Contracts + payments portal

Read
$5M
in contracts
500
contract docs

Stack

Laravel · WordPress · PHP

Standalone PHP migration scripts deliberately not loading WordPress, to dodge plugin Guzzle conflicts on monthly R2 cron syncs.

Rail.One

Corporate rebuild + change management

Read
DE / EN
bilingual
2
pauses survived

Stack

Next.js · Sanity (Laravel-adjacent governance)

Discipline as a feature: formal change-request quotation retroactively captured mid-build scope creep without losing the relationship.

What you get

Laravel Development Services We Provide

We don't do every Laravel project, only the ones where the domain is interesting and the engagement is multi-year. Below is the actual menu.

01

Greenfield Laravel builds

ERPs, CRMs, internal platforms, B2B portals. Where business logic is the product.

02

Laravel modernisation

Upgrades from old Laravel versions. Replacing dying packages. Queue and job architecture. Sanctum auth. Forge deployment pipelines.

03

Laravel + frontend pairings

Laravel + Vue.js, Laravel + Inertia, Laravel + Livewire, or Laravel headless behind a Next.js frontend. Pick the right one for the surface.

04

Domain-heavy work

Tendering, contracts, billing reconciliation, multi-tenant business logic. The kind of model the framework was built to express.

05

Forge + Cloudflare deployment

Standalone migration scripts (R2 / S3) that don't load Laravel or WordPress so they survive plugin conflicts. Database clone workflows.

06

Change-management as engineering

Formal change-request quotations, retroactive scope capture, mid-build pause recovery. The non-code work that keeps the project shippable.

The Laravel decision matrix

When Laravel Is the Right Choice for Your Application

Two axes decide it: transactional complexity and domain rule density. Below is where each of our builds sits, and the platform that wins in each corner.

Low txn · high rules

Rule-heavy but light on transactions. A content or workflow CMS often carries this.

High txn · high rules → Laravel

The Laravel corner. PES, All White Laser and Ontick all live here: dense rules over real transactional volume.

Low txn · low rules → WordPress

Marketing sites and simple CMS surfaces. The framework would be overhead here.

High txn · low rules → Node

High throughput, thin domain. A Node API or Python service tends to fit better.

Good fit if

Where Laravel earns its place

  • Builds that are too transactional for WordPress and too business-domain-specific for a generic Node API
  • Existing Laravel codebases on old versions needing modernisation, not rewrites
  • B2B platforms with tendering, contracts, or commission-reconciliation as the core
  • Multi-year engagements where engineering discipline matters more than weekly velocity

Probably not a fit

We'll point you elsewhere when it fits better

  • Marketing sites or pure CMS work: pick WordPress or Next.js + Sanity
  • Real-time collaboration apps with heavy websocket / CRDT needs: pick Node
  • Mobile-first apps where backend is mostly auth + storage: pick Supabase or Firebase

Stack we ship on

Laravel Technology Stack We Work With

Framework
Laravel (current LTS) · Sanctum · Horizon · queues
Frontend
Vue.js · Inertia · Livewire · Next.js (headless)
Data
MySQL · Redis cache · queue backends
Deploy
Laravel Forge · Cloudflare · standalone PHP migration scripts

Honest comparison

Why Choose Appycodes for Laravel Development

CapabilityGeneric dev shopFreelancerIn-house hireAppycodes
Domain-heavy modelling (tenders, contracts, billing)RareSometimesIf senior Yes
Modernises old Laravel without a rewriteMixedSometimesMaybe Yes
Vue / Inertia / Livewire / headless pairingsOne of themMixedTeam defaultYes, all four
Forge plus Cloudflare deployment patternsSometimesRare Yes Yes
Change-management as engineering No NoN/AYes, by default
Multi-year retention on the same codebaseMixedHigh risk YesBuilt in

We aren't the call for a marketing site or a thin CRUD app. We are the call when the build is genuinely domain engineering: tendering, contracts, billing reconciliation, or an old Laravel codebase that needs modernising rather than replacing.

The discipline isn't writing the code. It's writing the change-request quote when the client comes back after the pause.

From a Rail.One post-mortem

Laravel

Build or Modernise a Laravel Application With Appycodes

Contact