Turn your Lovable, Claude or Bolt web app into a real native mobile app

If you built the web app on Lovable, Claude, Bolt, v0 or AI Studio with a real backend (Supabase, Firebase, Node, Laravel, Python, anything), we reuse the database, the API layer, the auth, the billing and any third-party integrations you already have. The mobile app talks to the same endpoints the web app does. You ship a mobile app without paying to rebuild the backend twice.

Common case. We take your existing web UI as the visual and behavioural reference, design the data model and the API surface properly, build the backend and database from scratch, and then build the native app on top. The web app and the native app share the same backend from day one: no duplicate APIs, no diverging schemas.

We default to React Native when your web app is already in React (Lovable, Bolt, v0, Claude, AI Studio all output React) because the team, the components, the validation logic and the type definitions carry across the boundary cleanly. We pick Flutter when there is existing Dart expertise on the team or when pixel-identical rendering across iOS and Android is a hard requirement. We will tell you directly which one fits your product, not which one we want to write this month.

The whole backend, obviously: API, database, business logic, auth, billing. On the frontend, with React Native we typically share types, validation schemas (Zod), API client code, and a meaningful chunk of business logic and state management. UI components are different because mobile and web have different interaction patterns, but they look and feel like the same product because the design system primitives port across.

Native. React Native and Flutter render real native UI components, not HTML inside a webview. Animations run on the GPU, navigation matches platform conventions (iOS swipe-back, Android system back), and screen transitions stay under 100ms on entry-level devices. The wrap-the-website approach gets rejected by reviewers and abandoned by users, we do not ship it.

Yes. Build configuration, signing, capabilities setup, store listing copy, screenshots, privacy declarations, and the reviewer back-and-forth when rejection happens. We have shipped enough apps to know which rejection reasons are likely for AI-built products and how to pre-empt them before submission.

Push via FCM and APNs (Expo, or bare RN), with deep links into specific screens. Offline reads via SQLite or WatermelonDB with an explicit sync layer. OTA updates via EAS Update or CodePush so we can ship JavaScript fixes the same day without waiting for a store review. Native module changes still go through a real store update, we are deliberate about which change goes which path.

When the backend already exists and is healthy, 8 to 12 weeks from kickoff to both stores. When we need to build or harden the backend first, 12 to 18 weeks. Faster than this is usually a wrap-the-website project that gets rejected; slower than this usually means scope has crept past the native version of the web product.

Yes. Code lands in your GitHub. Backend deploys to your cloud accounts. App Store and Play Store listings are on your developer accounts, not ours. We do not hold the keys to your product: that is a non-negotiable principle on every engagement.

Yes, that is how most of our engagements run. The same team works on the shared backend and on both frontends, so a feature shipped on the web is on the roadmap for the native app the same sprint, not three months later when someone remembers.